HC dismisses plea challenging arrest of former minister Mahesh Joshi in JJM scam case | Jaipur News

47529300 https://jaipur.visitinrajasthan.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/cropped-cropped-R-2.png

HC dismisses plea challenging arrest of former minister Mahesh Joshi in JJM scam case

Jaipur: Former Rajasthan minister Mahesh Joshi failed to get relief from the Rajasthan High Court Friday after the court dismissed a habeas corpus petition challenging his arrest in the alleged Jal Jeevan Mission (JJM) scam.A division bench of Justice Umashankar Vyas and Justice Ashok Kumar Jain rejected the petition filed by Joshi’s son, Rohit Joshi, and said a detailed order explaining the reasons for the dismissal would be issued separately.The petition sought Joshi’s release on the ground that mandatory legal procedures were allegedly not followed during his arrest by the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) on May 7. It was contended that family members were not provided written information regarding the grounds of arrest, making the detention illegal.Opposing the plea, advocate general Rajendra Prasad argued that a similar challenge was already considered and rejected by the trial court. “Identical relief could not be sought simultaneously before different forums after the competent court already upheld the arrest. The information regarding the grounds and circumstances of the arrest was conveyed to family members through oral and technological means,” the AG argued.Joshi was arrested by the ACB from his residence on May 7 in connection with the alleged multi-crore JJM scam and was subsequently sent to judicial custody on May 11.The High Court’s decision comes days after a special court dealing with ACB matters rejected Joshi’s plea challenging the legality of his arrest. Special judge Rajesh Kumar Dadiya dismissed the application on June 9, observing that Joshi’s family members were present when he was taken into custody, his son was informed about the arrest and his counsel represented him during remand proceedings. The trial court accepted the prosecution’s contention that all legal requirements were complied with.

Source link

Rate this post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *